Legal Opinion

Sarah E. Healea v. Otis R. Bowen, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided October 5, 1988No. 87-2300Published

1Opinion of the Court

BAUER, Chief Judge.

Sarah E. Healea is a 69-year-old widow who, in 1976, began receiving widow’s insurance benefits from the Social Security Administration (SSA) under Title II of the Social Security Act (the Act). In October, 1982, Mrs. Healea applied for and eventually received Supplemental Security Income (SSI) pursuant to Title XYI of the Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1381 et seq., to augment her Title II benefits. On August 10, 1984, an Ad ministrative Law Judge (AU) determined that the SSA had overpaid Mrs. Healea $1,419.40 in widow’s benefits in 1978, 1979, and 1980. The AU further concluded that…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-FonsecaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Watt v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Philbrook v. GlodgettSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API