Hines v. Illinois Central Gulf Railroad
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
SCHULTZ, Justice.
This appeal involves an action for damages arising out of an auto-train collision. We must decide whether the Iowa Department of Transportation (DOT) or the fact finder in a judicial proceeding should determine whether a railroad crossing is extra-hazardous. This issue depends upon the applicability of Iowa Code section 307.-26(5)(b). The pertinent language in this section provides: “[a] railroad crossing shall not be found to be particularly hazardous for any purpose unless the [DOT] has determined it to be particularly hazardous.” 1 The district court interpreted this…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Grand Trunk Railway Co. v. IvesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- State v. MonroeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1975
- Consolidated Freightways Corp. of Del. v. NicholasSupreme Court of Iowa · 1965
- Wilson v. Iowa CitySupreme Court of Iowa · 1969
- Sullivan v. Chicago & Northwestern Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1982
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- State of Iowa v. Jonathan Q. AdamsSupreme Court of Iowa · 2012
- Slager v. HWA Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1989
- Goodell v. Humboldt CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1998
- City of Davenport v. SeymourSupreme Court of Iowa · 2008
- Nick C. Rhoades v. State of IowaSupreme Court of Iowa · 2016
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.