Legal Opinion

Hines v. Illinois Central Gulf Railroad

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 16, 1983No. 67710PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHULTZ, Justice.

This appeal involves an action for damages arising out of an auto-train collision. We must decide whether the Iowa Department of Transportation (DOT) or the fact finder in a judicial proceeding should determine whether a railroad crossing is extra-hazardous. This issue depends upon the applicability of Iowa Code section 307.-26(5)(b). The pertinent language in this section provides: “[a] railroad crossing shall not be found to be particularly hazardous for any purpose unless the [DOT] has determined it to be particularly hazardous.” 1 The district court interpreted this…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Grand Trunk Railway Co. v. IvesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. State v. MonroeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1975
  3. Consolidated Freightways Corp. of Del. v. NicholasSupreme Court of Iowa · 1965
  4. Wilson v. Iowa CitySupreme Court of Iowa · 1969
  5. Sullivan v. Chicago & Northwestern Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1982

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. State of Iowa v. Jonathan Q. AdamsSupreme Court of Iowa · 2012
  2. Slager v. HWA Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1989
  3. Goodell v. Humboldt CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1998
  4. City of Davenport v. SeymourSupreme Court of Iowa · 2008
  5. Nick C. Rhoades v. State of IowaSupreme Court of Iowa · 2016

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API