Legal Opinion

Nick C. Rhoades v. State of Iowa

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided April 15, 2016No. 15–1169PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

APPEL, Justice.

In this case, we consider whether a defendant who has pled guilty to a criminal offense but later successfully challenged the validity of the plea may qualify as a “wrongfully imprisoned person” under Iowa Code section 663A.1 (2015).

I. Background Facts and Proceedings.

Nicholas Rhoades was HIV positive when he came in contact with A.P. on a social networking site. After exchanging messages, A.P invited Rhoades to his home. A.P. understood Rhoades to be HIV negative, in part because of Rhoades’s online profile. Rhoades and A.P. engaged in consensual unprotected oral and protected…

2Cases cited54 opinions

  1. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Missouri v. FryeSupreme Court of the United States · 2012

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Jacob Lee Schmidt v. State of IowaSupreme Court of Iowa · 2018
  2. State of Iowa v. Daimonay Darice RichardsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 2017
  3. State of Iowa v. Iowa District Court for Scott CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 2017
  4. Simon Seeding & Sod, Inc. v. Dubuque Human Rights Commission and Jermaine StapletonSupreme Court of Iowa · 2017
  5. Jbs Swift & Company and American Zurich Insurance Company v. Rosalva OchoaSupreme Court of Iowa · 2016

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API