Legal Opinion

Tiers v. Pennsylvania Railroad

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 28, 1927No. Appeal, 127PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Sadler,

Miss Tiers brought this action of trespass to recover damages from the defendant for injuries sustained by falling into a depression between its tracks, where they pass a suburban station known as Oakmont. The question of liability was submitted to the jury, and a verdict rendered for plaintiff, upon which judgment was entered, and this appeal followed. A description of the locus in quo is essential to a proper understanding of the questions involved.

The two-track railroad runs north and south through Oakmont, and is paralleled by two streets, the one at the east…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Conn v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  2. Sturgis v. Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Legge v. New York, New Haven, & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
  4. Sullivan v. Philadelphia & Reading RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1858
  5. Flanagan v. Philadelphia, Wilmington & Baltimore RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1897

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dugan v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  2. Heller v. Consolidated Rail Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. Koontz v. Baltimore Ohio R. R. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  4. Noonan Et Ux. v. Pa. Railroad Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  5. Rivera v. P.P.&L., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lehigh County1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API