Sturgis v. Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Shiawassee. (Newton, J.) Case. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.
Plaintiff fell into a cattle-guard at Durand, where defendant's railway crosses from the station grounds into the adjoining highway leading to the village, and was injured. w She sued defendant for negligence, alleged to have consisted in leaving the pit open at the place in question, claiming that the railroad track was used as a foot-path, and that defendant was bound to keep it in safe traveling order.
Plaintiff had arrived with her husband on a train from Caines to Durand, arriving after dark in the evening of December 1, 1885. She was not acquainted with the premises. Instead of going…
2Cited by18 opinions
- Ryan v. TowarMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
- Douglas v. BerglandMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
- Alabama Great Southern Railway Co. v. GodfreySupreme Court of Alabama · 1908
- McNaughton v. Illinois Central Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1907
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. HobbsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.