Legal Opinion

Sturgis v. Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 28, 1888PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Error to Shiawassee. (Newton, J.) Case. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

Plaintiff fell into a cattle-guard at Durand, where defendant's railway crosses from the station grounds into the adjoining highway leading to the village, and was injured. w She sued defendant for negligence, alleged to have consisted in leaving the pit open at the place in question, claiming that the railroad track was used as a foot-path, and that defendant was bound to keep it in safe traveling order.

Plaintiff had arrived with her husband on a train from Caines to Durand, arriving after dark in the evening of December 1, 1885. She was not acquainted with the premises. Instead of going…

2Cited by18 opinions

  1. Ryan v. TowarMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Douglas v. BerglandMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Alabama Great Southern Railway Co. v. GodfreySupreme Court of Alabama · 1908
  4. McNaughton v. Illinois Central Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1907
  5. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. HobbsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API