Johnson Neurological Clinic, Inc. v. Kirkman

McGEE, Judge.

Defendant Kirkman argues the entry of summary judgment in favor of plaintiff was improper. Because we find there is a genuine issue of material fact regarding whether the statute of limitations had expired, we agree.

I

Defendant first argues the trial court erred by entering summary judgment for plaintiff and by not entering judgment for Kirkman, claiming the three-year statute of limitations had expired before the *330filing of plaintiffs complaint. Because it is not clear when the statute of limitations began to run, it is also unclear whether or not the action was timely filed.

Unless…