Legal Opinion

Duke University v. Stainback

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided July 7, 1987No. 76A87PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Justice.

The sole issue on this appeal is whether the facts found by the trial judge support the conclusion of law that defendant Robert L. Stainback was estopped from pleading the statute of limitations against Duke in this action. We hold that the conclusion of law was properly supported and, therefore, affirm the decision of the Court of Appeals.

I

Robert L. Stainback, Jr., a nine-year-old boy, was admitted to Duke Hospital on 21 May 1977 for treatment of injuries sustained in a collision between the bicycle he was riding and an automobile. His father, defendant Robert L. Stainback,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Watkins v. Central Motor Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. Nowell v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  3. McNeely Ex Rel. McNeely v. WaltersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. White v. Consolidated Planning, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
  2. Friedland v. GalesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
  3. Stratton v. Royal Bank of CanadaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
  4. Gore v. Myrtle/MuellerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2007
  5. Duke University v. St. Paul Mercury InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API