Legal Opinion
Anderson v. United Air Lines, Inc.
District Court, S.D. California
Decided May 5, 1960No. Civ. 777-57PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TOLIN, District Judge.
With regard to informing counsel of its action concerning proposed instruction, the court has discharged its obligation under F.R.Civ.P. 51, 28 U.S.C.A. with the exception of a ruling upon the propriety of defendants’ Requested Instruction No. 65 which reads as follows:
“You are instructed as a matter of law, that any award made to the plaintiff in this case is not income to the plaintiff within the meaning of the Federal Income Tax Law. Plaintiff is entitled to an award of damages. You are to follow the instructions already given by this court in measuring those damages…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hall v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1955
- Dempsey v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1952
- Atherley v. MacDonald, Young & Nelson, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1956
- Mitchell v. EmbladeArizona Supreme Court · 1956
- The New York Central Railroad Company v. Alberta L. Delich, Administratrix of the Estate of Daniel B. Delich, DeceasedCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1958
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Marion Domeracki v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1971
- Rodriguez v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1978
- Tenore v. Nu Car Carriers, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1975
- Brooks v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1967
- Huddell v. LevinDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1975
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.