Allstate Insurance v. Durham
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Harwell, Chief Justice:
Allstate Insurance Company (Allstate) appeals the denial of its motion for a new trial based on the inadequacy of a jury verdict, alleging that the trial judge abused his discretion in refusing to grant a new trial. We agree and reverse.
I. FACTS
On August 24, 1988, Randall Durham (Durham) performed plumbing services in the home of Lawrence J. and Linda M. McReynolds, which included the connection of lavatories in the upstairs bathroom. Three months later, a water line Durham had installed separated from its lavatory connection and flooded the majority of the McReynolds’…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- O'Neal v. BowlesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
- Toole v. TooleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1973
- Easler v. HEJAZ TEMPLE OF GREENVILLE, SCSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985
3Cited by22 opinions
- Elam v. South Carolina Department of TransportationSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2004
- Welch v. EpsteinCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2000
- Vinson v. HartleyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1996
- Proctor v. Department of Health & Environmental ControlCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2006
- Patterson v. ReidCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1995
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.