Legal Opinion
People for Environmental Progress v. Leisz
District Court, C.D. California
Decided March 25, 1974No. 73-1405-LTLPublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
LYDICK, District Judge.
Plaintiff and intervenor here seek declaratory, injunctive and mandatory relief with regard to the Brushland Management Program of the U. S. Forest Service, a program which involves the spraying of certain herbicides on National Forest Lands in California. Plaintiff alleges that defendants have failed to comply with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), 42 U.S. C. § 4321 et seq., by not preparing an adequate Environmental Impact Statement, and have violated the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA), 7 U.S.C. § 136 et seq., by their use…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Sierra Club v. MortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. CampSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Linda R. S. v. Richard D.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. Students Challenging Regulatory Agency Procedures (SCRAP)Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Linda RS v. Richard D.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- In re "Agent Orange" Product Liability LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- General Accounting Office v. General Accounting Office Personnel Appeals Board, Morris L. Shaller, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
- State v. SchwabWashington Supreme Court · 1985
- In Re "Agent Orange" Product Liability LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1979
- Almond Hill School v. United States Department Of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.