Peoples State Bank v. Dickie
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
LORING, Justice.
In a suit upon a promissory note the defendants had a verdict, and the plaintiff has appealed from an order denying its motion for judgment notAvithstanding that verdict or for a neAv trial.
January 12, 1932, defendants gave their note to the plaintiff for $873.15. This note represented the defendant Merlyn’s indebtedness to the bank. Charles, his father, signed with him as an accommodation indorser. The note was due July 12, 1932, and October 11,' 1932, the plaintiff, after taking a financial statement from Merlyn and a new note signed by him alone, marked the note paid and…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Moquist v. ChapelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
- Engstad v. SyversonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
3Cited by2 opinions
- Sherman v. Minnesota Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
- Calhoun Realty Co. v. Edgewater Holding Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1948