Legal Opinion

Bradley Lumber Co. of Ark. v. Cheney

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 10, 1956No. 5-1057PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGeorge Rose Smith, J.

This is a hill in equity by which the appellant seeks to enjoin the Commissioner of Revenues from enforcing a regulation issued under § 1 of Act 100 of 1955 (Ark. Stats. 1947, § 84-2107). It is asserted that Act 100 was not constitutionally passed by the General Assembly and that in any event there is no statutory authority for the imposition of a severance tax upon rough lumber as distinguished from timber. The chancellor held Act 100 to he constitutional and dismissed the appellant’s complaint.

Section 1 of Act 100 requires, in substance, that a purchaser of severed natural resources must…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Harrington v. WhiteSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1917
  2. Railway Co. v. GillSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1891
  3. Chicot County v. DaviesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1882
  4. Perry v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1919
  5. Mueller v. St. Louis Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1948

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hoover v. Board of County CommissionersOhio Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Reaves v. JonesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1974
  3. County of Howard v. RotenberrySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
  4. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports1997
  5. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports1996

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API