Bradley Lumber Co. of Ark. v. Cheney
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the CourtGeorge Rose Smith, J.
This is a hill in equity by which the appellant seeks to enjoin the Commissioner of Revenues from enforcing a regulation issued under § 1 of Act 100 of 1955 (Ark. Stats. 1947, § 84-2107). It is asserted that Act 100 was not constitutionally passed by the General Assembly and that in any event there is no statutory authority for the imposition of a severance tax upon rough lumber as distinguished from timber. The chancellor held Act 100 to he constitutional and dismissed the appellant’s complaint.
Section 1 of Act 100 requires, in substance, that a purchaser of severed natural resources must…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Harrington v. WhiteSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1917
- Railway Co. v. GillSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1891
- Chicot County v. DaviesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1882
- Perry v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1919
- Mueller v. St. Louis Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1948
3Cited by7 opinions
- Hoover v. Board of County CommissionersOhio Supreme Court · 1985
- Reaves v. JonesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1974
- County of Howard v. RotenberrySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
- Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports1997
- Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.