Legal Opinion

City of Sisseton v. Western Surety Co.

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 28, 1926No. File No. 5990PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DILLON. J.

Plaintiff, a municipality, seeks to recover from defendant, Western Surety Company, on a depositary bond, for the amount of $2,9.34.24. This sum, being the amount of moneys 'belonging to plaintiff, was on deposit in the Guaranty State Bank of Sisseton at the time said bank became insolvent. The facts as disclosed by the record are: That the city council of said municipality designated said bank as the depositary for its funds; that defendant, Western Surety Company, became surety for the bank, as depositary for said funds, furnishing a bond in the amount of $6,000; that, at the time…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McCormick v. HopkinsIllinois Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Allibone v. AmesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Edgerton Independent Consolidated School District No. 2 v. VolzSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926
  4. National Surety Co. v. McCormickCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1920

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. TylerDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1963
  2. Washington County v. StephensIdaho Supreme Court · 1928
  3. United States v. Merchants Mutual Bonding CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1963
  4. Jones v. O'BrienSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Vogel v. City of VinitaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API