Legal Opinion

Washington County v. Stephens

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided May 2, 1928No. 4907PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBudge, J.

Appellants, defendants below, were sureties on a depository bond given by the Bank of Washington County to Washington county to secure the deposit of funds in the county treasury. After the execution of the bond and at a time when the county had on deposit in the bank a considerable amount of money, the bank suspended business. This action was brought by the county against appellants and a number of other defendants to recover upon several depository bonds. The appeal is by the individual sureties from a judgment in favor of the county, entered upon verdict directed by the court.

A portion of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. PoetkerIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Henry County v. SalmonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1907
  3. Davidow v. GriswoldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
  4. Western Casualty & Guaranty Ins. v. Board of Com'rsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  5. State v. BreyerIdaho Supreme Court · 1925

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Oklahoma City v. Century Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  2. Mid-City National Bank v. Mar Building Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1975
  3. Bell v. CarlsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Monte Rico Mill. & Min. Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Bunker v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1934

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API