Legal Opinion
Cleveland v. Internet Specialties West, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 11, 2009No. B203174PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
O’NEILL, J. *
SUMMARY
Kenneth Cleveland and William Bickley sued several defendants in December 2005, asserting claims of breach of contract and fraud, among others, in connection with a $75,000 investment made pursuant to the terms of a February 1995 agreement. Defendants sought summary judgment on statute of limitations grounds, asserting, among other things, that under the discovery rule for accrual of causes of action, the statutes of limitations began to run in 1996 or 1997, because plaintiffs were then on notice of their injury. The trial court agreed, finding all statutes of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Norgart v. Upjohn Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
- Fox v. Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2005
- Hobart v. Hobart Estate Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
- April Enterprises, Inc. v. KTTVCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Gutierrez v. MofidCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Ivanoff v. Bank of America, N.A.California Court of Appeal · 2017
- Cleveland v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Dias v. Nationwide Life InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2010
- Clark v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2010
- Fanucci v. Allstate Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2009
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.