Legal Opinion
Mabey Bridge & Shore, Inc. v. Schoch
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided January 24, 2012No. 11-1406PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
BARRY, Circuit Judge.
This case presents the question of whether the Pennsylvania Steel Products Procurement Act (“Steel Act”), 73 Pa. Stat. §§ 1881-1887, is unconstitutional insofar as it prohibits the use of temporary bridges made out of foreign steel on public works projects. Appellant Mabey Bridge & Shore, Inc. (“Mabey”) appeals the District Court’s grant of summary judgment on its claim that the Steel Act (and the Department of Transportation’s interpretation thereof) is preempted by the Buy America Act, 23 U.S.C. § 313, as well as on its claims that the Steel Act…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Federal Communications Commission v. Beach Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Heller v. Doe Ex Rel. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Massachusetts Board of Retirement v. MurgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Wyeth v. LevineSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Allied Structural Steel Co. v. SpannausSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Christ the King Manor, Inc. v. Secretary United States Department of Health & Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
- Araujo v. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
- Ravanna Spencer v. BushCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
- In Re Vehicle Carrier Services Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
- Heffner v. MurphyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.