Legal Opinion

Mettinger v. Globe Slicing MacH. Co., Inc.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided May 14, 1998Published

1Opinion of the Court

153 N.J. 371 (1998)

709 A.2d 779

DAVID METTINGER, PLAINTIFF,

v.

GLOBE SLICING MACHINE CO., INC., NEW GLOBE PARENT, INC., DAPHNE HORIZON, CO., INC., ABC 1-5 (SAID ENTITIES BEING FICTITIOUS AND UNKNOWN), AND XYZ 1-5 (SAID ENTITIES BEING FICTITIOUS AND UNKNOWN COMPONENT PARTS MANUFACTURERS), DEFENDANTS, AND W.W. LOWENSTEN, INC., DEFENDANT AND THIRD PARTY PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

v.

GLOBE FOOD EQUIPMENT COMPANY, THIRD PARTY DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued November 17, 1997.

Decided May 14, 1998.

Joel Schneider, argued the cause for appellant (Archer & Greiner, attorneys; George F.…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited57 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Doe v. PoritzSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
  3. Ray v. Alad Corp.California Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Suter v. San Angelo Foundry & MacHine CompanySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
  5. Ramirez v. Amsted Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1981

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API