State v. Kinsey
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
McCORMICK, Presiding Judge.
Appellee was charged by information with criminal trespass. See V.T.C.A., Penal Code, Section 30.05(a)(2). Appellee filed a motion to quash the information on the ground that it failed to state an offense under the Penal Code. The trial court granted appellee’s motion and ordered the information set aside. On direct appeal, the Fort Worth Court of Appeals affirmed the dismissal of the information. State v. Kinsey, 839 S.W.2d 168 (Tex.App. — Fort Worth 1992). We granted the State’s petition to review whether the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Langston v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
- Chance v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
- State v. Staley, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1991
- Proctor v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1989
- State v. KinseyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992
3Cited by24 opinions
- Hill v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
- Bader v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2000
- Crum v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1997
- Anthony v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2006
- Sparkman v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)1997
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.