Legal Opinion

Rogers v. Drewry

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 20, 1935No. 30,478PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Julius J. Olson, Justice.

Defendants appeal from an order overruling their general demurrer to plaintiff’s amended complaint, the trial court having certified the question presented thereby to be important and doubtful.

The challenged pleading alleges that plaintiff is the receiver of Drewry & Sons Company, a corporation organized under the laws of Delaware but authorized to do business in Minnesota and having its principal office at St. Paul; that on and prior to April 5, 1932, defendants were the officers, sole stockholders, and board of directors of that company; that between April 5 and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. McCandless v. FurlaudSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Seitz v. FreySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
  3. Baker v. FrischkornMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Marin v. CalmensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  5. Hutchins v. BassinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Boubelik v. Liberty State BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
  2. PJ Acquisition Corp. v. SkoglundSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  3. Swanson v. Tomlinson Lumber Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  4. DeWitt v. Itasca-Mantrap Cooperative Electrical Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
  5. Bartholomew v. Avalon Capital Group, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2009

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API