Legal Opinion

Metropolitan Group Property and Casualty Insurance Company v. Fite

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided September 2, 2022No. 3:20-cv-05697Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 7 METROPOLITAN GROUP PROPERTY CASE NO. 3:20-cv-05697-JHC 8 AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, ORDER 9 Plaintiff, 10 v. 11 AUSTIN FITE, 12 Defendant. 13 AUSTIN FITE, 14 Consolidated Plaintiff, 15 v. 16 METROPOLITAN GROUP PROPERTY 17 AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY AND METROPOLITAN 18 PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, registered foreign 19 insurers doing business in the State of Washington; and “JOHN AND JANE DOES” 20 1-10, 21 Consolidated Defendants. 22 23 This matter comes before the Court on Metropolitan…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Triton Energy Corp. v. Square D Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  4. Smith v. Safeco InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Van Noy v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 2001

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API