Legal Opinion

Van Noy v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 18, 2001No. 68548-7PublishedCited by 63 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAlexander, C.J.

— This appeal had its inception when a group of State Farm Insurance Company (State Farm) policyholders commenced a class action against State Farm claiming that the insurance company breached fiduciary and contractual obligations, acted in bad faith, and violated the Consumer Protection Act (chapter 19.86 RCW). The trial court granted State Farm’s motion for summary judgment and dismissed the plaintiffs’ causes of action. The Court of Appeals reversed the trial court, concluding that there were material issues of fact which precluded summary judgment in favor of State Farm. State Farm…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Tank v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Safeco Insurance Co. of America v. ButlerWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Hayden v. Mutual of Enumclaw InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Coventry Associates v. Am. States Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Coventry Associates v. American States InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1998

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by63 opinions

  1. Jones v. Allstate Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Smith v. Safeco Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Smith v. Safeco InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  4. St. Paul Fire and Marine Ins. Co. v. Onvia, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2008
  5. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Onvia, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2008

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API