Legal Opinion

Goldsmith v. . Samet

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 4, 1931PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Stacy, 0. J.

It was held in Small v. Morrison, 185 N. C., 577, 118 S. E., 12, that an unemancipated, minor child, living in the household of its parents, could not maintain an action in tort against its parents or either of them, upon the ground that no such action was known at the common law and none had been authorized by statute.

The policy of the law was not changed in this respect by C. S., 160, for there the right of action for death by wrongful act is limited to “such as would, if the injured party had lived, have entitled him to an action for damages therefor.” Moreover, the amount…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Small Ex Rel. Balthis v. MorrisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  2. Bryant v. . BryantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  3. Carpenter v. Asheville Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  4. Parker v. . PotterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  5. Hood v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1913

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Raftery v. Wm. C. Vick Construction Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  2. Carver v. CarverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  3. Brown v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  4. Davenport v. . PatrickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
  5. In Re the Estate of IvesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API