Legal Opinion
Ohio Citizen Action v. City of Seven Hills
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided February 2, 1999No. 1:98 CV 1205PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
NUGENT, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge David S. Perelman. The Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation (Document # 16), submitted on December 3, 1998, and FURTHER DETERMINES that §§ 167.01, 167.02, 167 .03, and portions of § 167.05, of the Codified Ordinances of the City of Seven Hills, are facially unconstitutional.
Factual and Procedural Background 1
Plaintiff, Ohio Citizen Action, is a nonprofit organization that attempts to build political support for various legislative proposals and…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Freedman v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Henry Lavado, Jr. v. Patrick W. KeohaneCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- North Olmsted Chamber of Commerce v. City of North OlmstedDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2000
- National Federation of Republican Assemblies v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2002
- Watchtower Bible & Tract Society of New York, Inc. v. Village of StrattonDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1999
- Ohio Citizen Action v. City of Mentor-On-The-LakeDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2003
- Albright v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2021
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.