Legal Opinion
United States v. Michael R. Goland
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 26, 1990No. 89-50447PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FLETCHER, Circuit Judge:
Michael Goland takes an interlocutory appeal in a criminal case charging him with violation of federal election laws. His first trial was bifurcated1 from his codefend-ants’ trial and ended in a mistrial when the jury could not agree on a verdict. Goland appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to dismiss on the ground of double jeopardy. We affirm.
FACTS
The criminal charges against Goland arise from the 1986 campaign in California for a United States senate seat. The first superseding indictment charged Goland with five counts, all related to violations of the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Washington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Abney v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. JornSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- People v. GreenbergerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- United States v. David Allen Bates Ricky Lee ArcherCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. SimpsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Ronald D. ChickCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- In Re Harold E. Ford, (91-5497). United States of America v. Harold E. Ford, Douglas Beaty, Karl A. Schledwitz, and David Crabtree, (91-5548)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.