Legal Opinion
In Re Harold E. Ford, (91-5497). United States of America v. Harold E. Ford, Douglas Beaty, Karl A. Schledwitz, and David Crabtree, (91-5548)
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided March 2, 1992No. 91-5497, 91-5548PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CONTIE, Senior Circuit Judge.
Defendants appeal an order denying their motion to dismiss criminal charges on grounds of double jeopardy, arguing that the district court erred in granting a mistrial. Defendant Harold Ford also seeks mandamus review of an order directing jury selection for his retrial take place in a city other than the site of his retrial, and the propriety of the district court’s consideration of an FBI affidavit outlining evidence of juror misconduct.
I
Four defendants, Douglas Beaty, Karl S. Schledwitz, David Crabtree and Congressman Harold E. Ford, were charged in a nineteen…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- United States v. JornSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Arizona v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Kerr v. United States Dist. Court for Northern Dist. of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. PerezSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Wade v. HunterSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- United States v. FrostCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. DakotaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. FrostCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Lawrence Edward Crayton, Jr., Also Known as Manny Harris and Alex WintersCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Thomas Reid DecarloCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.