Legal Opinion

United States v. David Allen Bates Ricky Lee Archer

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 2, 1991No. 90-10127PublishedCited by 82 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FLETCHER, Circuit Judge:

Ricky Lee Archer and David Allen Bates appeal the district court’s denial of a motion to dismiss indictments charging them with armed robbery. Their initial trial ended when the district court sua sponte declared a mistrial. They allege that retrial would violate the fifth amendment double jeopardy clause. We agree with defendants and reverse.

FACTS

Archer’s and Bates’s charges arise from two Modesto bank robberies. The first occurred at Guarantee Savings & Loan on November 18, 1988; the second, at First Interstate Bank, on November 28, 1988. Archer and Bates each were…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Abney v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. United States v. JornSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Arizona v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Oregon v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. United States v. PerezSupreme Court of the United States · 1824

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by82 opinions

  1. People v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Wilson v. BellequeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  3. United States v. ChapmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  4. United States v. Gary A. NewmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  5. Harold Love v. Willis Morton, Administrator-Njsp Peter Verniero, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997

77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API