Legal Opinion
United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Dwan Bernard Gill, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 6, 2002No. 00-30296, 00-30318PublishedCited by 52 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROLL, District Judge.
Appellant Dwan Bernard Gill appeals from the district court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence seized pursuant to a search warrant and its imposition of consecutive sentences for conspiracy to distribute phencyclidine (PCP) and attempted possession of PCP with intent to distribute. The government cross-appeals the district court’s ruling that drug quantity had to be proven beyond a reasonable doubt for sentencing guidelines purposes. For the reasons set forth below, the district court correctly denied the motion to suppress but this matter is remanded for…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. Van LeeuwenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. DoggettCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
- United States of America,plaintiff-Appellee v. Armando Lopez-SotoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Ronald JordanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- United States v. Christina Maria Mendoza-PazCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Charles ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Edward SullivanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- United States v. James Manuel BanuelosCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Rosa HernandezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.