Legal Opinion

Madigan v. Teague

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 21, 1960No. 35100PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosellini, J.

This action arose out of an accident which occurred on 23rd avenue in the city of Seattle, when an automobile driven by the plaintiff stopped at an intersection and was struck from the rear by an automobile driven by Ruth Young. A few seconds thereafter, the Young automobile was struck by a panel truck driven by William H. Teague and pushed again into the rear of the plaintiff’s automobile. As a result of the accident, plaintiff was physically injured. Both drivers and their marital communities were joined as defendants, and defendants Young cross-complained against defendants Teague for…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Summers v. TiceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Young v. DilleWashington Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Schedler v. WagnerWashington Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Bullis v. BallWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Becker v. Tacoma Transit Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1957

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Jacob's Meadow Owners Ass'n v. PLATEAU 44Court of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  2. Jacob's Meadow Owners Ass'n v. Plateau 44 II, LLCCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  3. Phennah v. WhalenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1980
  4. Scott v. Rainbow Ambulance Service, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Fugere v. PierceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1971

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API