Legal Opinion

Swink v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 4, 1986No. Appeal, No. 1180 C. D. 1985PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge MacPhail,

Albert R. Swink, Sr. (Claimant) appeals an order of the Workmens Compensation Appeal Board (Board) affirming a referees decision which granted the modification petition of Burrell Construction & Supply Company (Employer), thereby permitting Employer to be subrogated to the right of Claimant against a third-party tortfeasor, and which denied Claimants claim petition. We affirm.

The referee made the following findings of feet, which are supported by the record:

1. The claimant, Albert R. Swink,. Sr., was injured in the course and scope of his employment with the Burrell…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Heckendorn v. Consolidated Rail Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Stark v. Posh Construction Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  3. M. A. Bruder & Son, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Fidler v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. National Mines Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Powell v. Sacred Heart HospitalCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. SKF USA, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  3. Swink v. WCAB (BURRELL C. & S. CO.)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  4. Schramm v. Allegheny County Sanitation AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  5. Powell v. Sacred Heart HospitalCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API