Legal Opinion

Lansverk v. Studebaker-Packard Corp.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 23, 1959No. 34977PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.

Quaere: Is the doctrine of forum non conveniens available to a defendant in a transitory out of state tort action brought in a superior court of the state of Washington where the plaintiff is a nonresident of that state, and the defendant is a foreign corporation doing business in and subject to the service of process in that state?

Answer: No.

Reason: Under the doctrine of forum non conveniens, although the court in which a transitory tort action is commenced has jurisdiction to hear and determine it, that court can, nonetheless, decline to - exercise its jurisdiction and enter an order of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. KepnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Missouri Ex Rel. Southern Railway Co. v. MayfieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. Richardson v. Pacific Power & Light Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Reynolds v. DayWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  5. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co. v. Superior Court, Creek CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Fox v. Bd. of Sup'rs of La. State Univ.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1991
  2. Chambers v. Merrell-Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Shewbrooks v. AC AND S. INC.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Werner v. WernerWashington Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Gulf Oil Company v. WoodsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1972

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API