Lansverk v. Studebaker-Packard Corp.
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.
Quaere: Is the doctrine of forum non conveniens available to a defendant in a transitory out of state tort action brought in a superior court of the state of Washington where the plaintiff is a nonresident of that state, and the defendant is a foreign corporation doing business in and subject to the service of process in that state?
Answer: No.
Reason: Under the doctrine of forum non conveniens, although the court in which a transitory tort action is commenced has jurisdiction to hear and determine it, that court can, nonetheless, decline to - exercise its jurisdiction and enter an order of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. KepnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Missouri Ex Rel. Southern Railway Co. v. MayfieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Richardson v. Pacific Power & Light Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1941
- Reynolds v. DayWashington Supreme Court · 1914
- St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co. v. Superior Court, Creek CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Fox v. Bd. of Sup'rs of La. State Univ.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1991
- Chambers v. Merrell-Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
- Shewbrooks v. AC AND S. INC.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1988
- Werner v. WernerWashington Supreme Court · 1974
- Gulf Oil Company v. WoodsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1972
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.