Legal Opinion

State v. . Snuggs

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 5, 1881PublishedCited by 11 opinions

INDICTMENT for illegally issuing a marriage license tried at Spring Term, 1881, of Stanly Superior Court, before Eure, J. The indictment was quashed upon the ground that no Indictable offence is charged in the bill, and the solicitor for •the state appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtRupein, J.

The charge against the defendant, who is a' register of deeds, is that of issuing a marriage license for a female of the age of fifteen years, without the written consent of her father, in violation of the statute (Bat. Rev., ch. 69', §§ 5 and 7) and the only question is whether under the law such conduct amounts to an indictable offence.. The fifth section referred to authorizes registers upon application to issue a license for the marriage of any two persons, provided nevertheless that when either party to the proposed marriage is under eighteen years of age and shall reside with the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. . TatomSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1873

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. MarchindoMontana Supreme Court · 1922
  2. State v. . PierceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
  3. State v. BloodworthSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886
  4. State v. RumfeltSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  5. State v. LilesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1904

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API