Legal Opinion

State v. Bloodworth

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 15, 1886PublishedCited by 12 opinions

This was an Indictment against the defendant, for not keeping a fence five feet- high around his cultivated field during crop season in the year 1885, tried before Meares, Judge, in the Criminal Court of New HanovER county, at the September Term,. 1885, of said court.

Read the full summary

This was an Indictment against the defendant, for not keeping a fence five feet- high around his cultivated field during crop season in the year 1885, tried before Meares, Judge, in the Criminal Court of New HanovER county, at the September Term,. 1885, of said court. The jury returned the following special verdict, to-wit: “The jury find, that the defendant was the occupier and cultivator of a farm, and that he did not have and keep a fence five feet high around the same during the crop season of the year 1885. But whether the defendant is guilty or not guilty under this bill of indictment,…

1Opinion of the Court

Ashe, J.,

(after stating the facts). The indictment was preferred under §2799 of The Code, which is as follows: “Every planter shall make a sufficient fence about his cleared ground under cultivation, at least five feet high, unless there shall be some navigable stream or deep water course, that shall be sufficient instead of such fence, and unless his lands shall be situated within the limits of a county, township or district, where the stock law may be in force.”

The statute, it will be seen, contains two exceptions, the.one that there is a navigable stream or deep water course that shall be…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. . BlueSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
  2. State v. . BraySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883
  3. State v. . LanierSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883
  4. State v. . ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884
  5. State v. HeatonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1879

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  2. State v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  3. State v. . PierceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
  4. State v. . BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  5. State v. Rippy.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1900

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API