Legal Opinion

Joseph v. Algemene Bank Nederland, NV

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 29, 1984No. Civ. A. 83-2281PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COHILL, District Judge.

Presently before the Court is Defendant Algemene Bank Nederland’s Motion to Dismiss the Complaint. Defendants Soels and Megatol have joined Algemene Bank Nederland’s motion.

I. The Complaint

The Complaint in this case is comprised of seven counts, three of which allege violation of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1961 et seq., (“RICO”). The three defendants are 1) Algemene Bank Nederland (“ABN”), 2) an ABN loan officer, Jan Soels, and 3) Megatol, a Swiss company in which Soels allegedly either had an interest or controlled.

Count…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. United States v. TurketteSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Stirone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. Kugler v. HelfantSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Miree v. DeKalb CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1977

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. In Re Enron Corp. Securities, Derivative & ERISADistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2003
  2. United States v. Frank JosephCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
  3. In Re Crazy Eddie Securities LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1989
  4. Professional Assets Management, Inc. v. Penn Square Bank, N.A.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1985
  5. Alfaro v. EF Hutton & Co., Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1985

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API