Legal Opinion

City of Stuart, Florida v. The 3M Company

District Court, D. South Carolina

Decided May 5, 2023No. 2:18-cv-03487Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA CHARLESTON DIVISION ) IN RE: AQUEOUS FILM-FORMING ) MDL No. 2:18-mn-2873-RMG FOAMS PRODUCTS LIABILITY ) LITIGATION ) ORDER AND OPINION ) ) This Order Relates to ) City of Stuart, Fl. v. 3M Co., et al., ) Case No. 2:18-cv-3487-RMG ) ) Before the Court is Defendants’ Co-Lead Counsel’s omnibus motion for summary judgment. (Dkt. No. 2695). For the reasons set forth below, the Court rules as follows. I. Background Plaintiff the City of Stuart (“Plaintiff,” “Stuart” or the “City) alleges that various Defendants manufactured and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. George F. Thompson v. Potomac Electric Power CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2002
  4. Phillips v. CSX Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
  5. D'AMARIO v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 2001

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API