Legal Opinion

People v. Oliver

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 12, 2001No. Docket 112341, 115064PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, J.

These consolidated cases arise from the same bank robbery and ensuing police stop of a car in the city of Jackson. In each case, the defendant argues that incriminating evidence resulting from the stop of the car should have been suppressed on the basis of the Fourth Amendment exclusionary rule. We *187conclude that the stop of the car was supported by reasonable suspicion and, thus, did not violate the Fourth Amendment. Accordingly, we agree with the refusal of the lower courts to suppress the evidence at issue.

I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Shortly before noon on December 1, 1994, an armed…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. United States v. SokolowSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Illinois v. WardlowSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Scott v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. People v. WilliamsMichigan Supreme Court · 2005
  2. People v. RoseMichigan Court of Appeals · 2010
  3. People v. JenkinsMichigan Supreme Court · 2005
  4. People v. SteeleMichigan Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. People v. CollinsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2012

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API