Legal Opinion

People v. Stevens

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 20, 1999No. 110866, Calendar No. 4PublishedCited by 76 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AFTER REMAND

Brickley, J.

We granted leave in this case to determine whether the Fourth Amendment requires the exclusion of evidence obtained under a valid search warrant, and during a search of proper scope, because of a violation of the “knock and announce” principles.1 If the Fourth Amendment does not require exclusion, then we must also determine whether evidence obtained after a violation of our “knock and announce” statute must be excluded. Given that the evidence would have been discovered despite any police misconduct and that excluding the evidence because of the misconduct puts the…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Brown v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by76 opinions

  1. Hudson v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  2. People v. KazmierczakMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
  3. People v. Hawkins; People v. ScherfMichigan Supreme Court · 2003
  4. People v. MartinMichigan Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. People v. HawkinsMichigan Supreme Court · 2003

71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API