Dung Tri Vo v. Gonzales
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
EDITH H. JONES, Chief Judge:
Petitioner Dung Tri Vo appeals a Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) decision finding him ineligible to apply for relief under former § 212(c) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (“INA”), 8 U.S.C. § 1182(c), because one of his crimes, unauthorized use of a motor vehicle (“UUV”), lacks a comparable ground of inadmissibility under INA § 212(a). 1 We find no error in the BIA’s determination that Vo’s crime does not have a statutory counterpart in § 212(a) and accordingly DENY the petition for review.
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Dung Tri Vo, a native and…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. St. CyrSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-FonsecaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Ernest Francis v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- Gary Laguerre v. Janet Reno, Jose, Martin Avelar-Cruz v. Janet RenoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Zamora-Mallari v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- Blake v. CarboneCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- Abebe v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Joel Siwe v. Eric Holder, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2014
- Vue v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.