Perron v. Concord
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtDuncan, J.
The statute provides that upon appeal all questions *34of fact determined by the board of adjustment shall be deemed to be prima facie lawful and reasonable, but permits the board’s decision to be set aside or vacated for errors of law, or when the court is “persuaded by the balance of probabilities, on the evidence before it, that said . . . decision is unjust or unreasonable.” RSA 31:78. Gelinas v. Portsmouth, 97 N. H. 248. The ordinance under which these proceedings were brought provides that no premises shall be “altered ... in use” until the enforcing officer shall have issued a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Town of Needham v. Winslow Nurseries, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1953
- City of Knoxville v. BrownTennessee Supreme Court · 1953
- Pratt v. Building Inspector of GloucesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1953
- Village of Riverside v. KuhneAppellate Court of Illinois · 1948
3Cited by14 opinions
- Town of Salem v. DurrettSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984
- Becker v. Town of Hampton FallsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
- City of Rockford v. SalleeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1970
- Hancock v. City of ConcordSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1971
- Gratton v. PellegrinoSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1975
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.