Legal Opinion

Village of Riverside v. Kuhne

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 16, 1948No. Gen. No. 44,174PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Friend

The defendant, Eugen Kuhne, appeals from a judgment of the criminal court of Cook county finding him guilty of violating the zoning ordinance of the Village of Riverside and assessing a fine of $25 and $157 costs. The appeal was taken directly to the Supreme Court on the theory that the validity of a municipal ordinance was involved, and the trial judge so certified.

It appears that on October 3, 1944, a complaint was filed before a police magistrate charging defendant with unlawfully using the premises in question for business purposes in violation of the zoning ordinance of the Village of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. City of Chicago v. KnobelIllinois Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Peasley v. MurphyIllinois Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Pennock v. FullerMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  4. Village of Riverside v. KuhneIllinois Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Dodge v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1883

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. City of Newark v. PulvermanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1953
  2. Tylle v. ZouchaNebraska Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Perron v. ConcordSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1959
  4. Hackett v. GaleSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1962
  5. City of Rockford v. SalleeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1970

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API