Henrylyn Irrigation District v. Thomas
Supreme Court of Colorado
Error to Denver District Count, Horn Granby Hilly em, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Hill
The defendant in error brought this action to, and did, obtain a money judgment against the plaintiff in error (an irrigation district) upon certain of its unpaid interest coupons. The district brings the case here for review, and contends that the statute provides the only method to the *414holder of such coupons for enforcing their payment, which ■ does not include the line of procedure attempted to be followed.
Irrigation districts are organized for the purpose of carrying out certain special improvements. Section 3456, R. S., 1908, provides that the interest on coupons shall be paid by revenue…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- City of Denver v. HyattSupreme Court of Colorado · 1900
- Board of County Commissioners v. WheelerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1907
- City of Golden v. Western Lumber & Pole Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1915
- In re Senate Resolution No. 10Supreme Court of Colorado · 1905
3Cited by7 opinions
- Divide Creek Irr. Dist. v. HollingsworthCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1934
- Burbank Irrigation District No. 4 v. DouglassWashington Supreme Court · 1927
- City of Sterling v. Commercial Savings BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1947
- Alpha Corp. v. Denver-Greeley Valley Irrigation DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1942
- Carter v. Badger Irrigation DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1925
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.