Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Burbank Irrigation District No. 4 v. Douglass

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 18, 1927No. 20503. Department OnePublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFrench, J.

This action was instituted by J. W. Hereford as a local land owner and water user, and also as representative of other land owners within the Burbank Irrigation District, and the irrigation district itself, against the county treasurer of Walla Walla county, the complaint being as follows:

I

“That Burbank Irrigation District No. 4 of Walla Walla county, Washington, is a municipal corporation, organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the state of Washington.

II

“That said Burbank Irrigation District No. 4, was organized as an irrigation district in the year 1918; that it comprises…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Sheldon v. PurdyWashington Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Thomas v. PattersonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1916
  3. Chicago Title & Trust Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1918
  4. Henrylyn Irrigation District v. ThomasSupreme Court of Colorado · 1918
  5. Rio Grande Junction Railway Co. v. Orchard Mesa Irrigation DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1918

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Haberman v. Washington Public Power Supply SystemWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Columbia Irrigation District v. Benton CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1928
  3. City of Newport v. McLaneCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
  4. McGraw v. HansbargerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1983
  5. State Ex Rel. Wells v. HartungWashington Supreme Court · 1929

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API