Wasko v. Manella
Connecticut Appellate Court
1DissentPeters, J.
This is a very hard case. As the old adage goes, hard cases make bad law.
The legal issue in this case is the proper allocation of a risk of loss. A building has suffered fire damage as the result of the negligence of an invited guest. Should the risk of loss be assigned to the negligent guest or to the insurance company that provided homeowners insurance coverage against the risk of loss with respect to the property that was severely damaged?
The answer to this question would be obvious if the homeowners insurance policy provided coverage for the insured property for the benefit of all comers.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Sutton v. JondahlCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1975
- Community Action for Greater Middlesex County, Inc. v. American Alliance InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Dilullo v. JosephSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- New England Cable Television Ass'n v. Department of Public Utility ControlSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Willow Funding Co., L.P. v. Grencom AssociatesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.