Legal Opinion

Smith Ex Rel. Smith v. Burleson

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 18, 1970No. 7025SC569PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMPBELL, Judge.

This appeal presents one question, and that is whether the trial court committed error in directing a verdict on the issue of negligence in favor of the plaintiff.

The burden of proof on the negligence issue rested upon the plaintiff. Ordinarily, it is not permissible to direct a verdict in favor of a litigant on whom rests the burden of proof. When facts are judicially admitted and are no longer a subject of inquiry, then it is not only permissible, but it is the duty of the judge to answer the issue. The function of the jury is to ascertain the facts. They have no duty when…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Sowers v. MarleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  2. Blake v. MallardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  3. Chisholm v. HallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  4. Melton v. CrottsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  5. Flintall v. Charlotte Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1963

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. ESTATE OF SMITH, BY & THROUGH SMITH v. UnderwoodCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
  2. Price v. ConleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
  3. Murray v. MurraySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  4. Crowder v. JenkinsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
  5. Murdock v. RatliffSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API