Legal Opinion

Schober v. Commissioner of Revenue

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 22, 2013No. A12-0873PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WRIGHT, Justice.

Relator Ronald Schober challenges the Minnesota Tax Court’s decision that the tax court lacked jurisdiction over an appeal from a letter of the Commissioner of Revenue. Schober also argues that the tax court erred by concluding that his refund claim is barred by res judicata and by his failure to pay taxes. We reverse the tax court’s decision as to its jurisdiction and affirm the tax court’s decision on the merits of Schober’s refund claim.

In 2005, the Department of Revenue (Department) audited Schober and determined that he had not remitted to the State certain funds…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Federal Trade Commission v. Standard Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Fabio v. BellomoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
  5. Port of Boston Marine Terminal Assn. v. Rederiaktiebolaget TransatlanticSupreme Court of the United States · 1970

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Breaker v. Bemidji State UniversityCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
  2. Daniel L. Berglund, Relator v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
  3. Guardian Energy, LLC v. Cnty. of WasecaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2019
  4. Cruz-Guzman v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2018
  5. James Klapmeier v. Joseph Michael EbelCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API