Sherman v. British Leyland Motors, Ltd.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
CHRISTENSEN, District Judge:
This is an action for alleged violations of the federal Automobile Dealers’ Day in *434Court Act,1 and the antitrust laws,2 and on pendent state claims.3 The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the defendants on all claims. Presented by plaintiffs’ appeal is the broad issue typical for such rulings of whether the pleadings, affidavits and depositions before the district court established as a matter of law that plaintiffs’ claims did not justify trial on the merits.4 The answer, of course, depends upon resolution of ancillary issues. Defendants’…
2Cases cited79 opinions
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by117 opinions
- Canderm Pharmacal, Ltd. v. Elder Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
- William Inglis & Sons Baking Co. v. Itt Continental Baking Company, Inc., William Inglis & Sons Baking Co. v. Itt Continental Baking Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Aydin Corporation, a Delaware Corporation v. Loral Corporation, a New York Corporation, and Conic Corporation, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Northrop Corp. v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- K-B Trucking Company and Keith Collins, Cross-Appellants v. Riss International Corporation and World Leasing, Inc., Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
112 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.