Legal Opinion
In Re Nancy Shao Su in Re Louis C. Su, A/K/A Chienlu Su, Debtors. Dora Carrillo v. Louis C. Su
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 20, 2002No. 01-55656PublishedCited by 289 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TASHIMA, Circuit Judge.
Dora Carrillo (“Carrillo”) filed an adversary complaint in Louis Su’s (“Su”) Chapter 7 bankruptcy case to determine the dischargeability of debt owed to her by Su. The bankruptcy court held that Su’s debt to Carrillo was nondischargeable. The Bankruptcy Appellate Panel (“BAP”) reversed, holding that the bankruptcy court erred by applying the incorrect legal standard. Carrillo appeals, arguing that the bankruptcy court correctly applied the law and that Su’s debt is nondischargeable. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 158(d), and we affirm the BAP.
I. FACTUAL…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Kawaauhau v. GeigerSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Tinker v. ColwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Miller v. J.D. Abrams Inc. (In Re Miller)Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
- In Re: Seymour Markowitz, Debtor. Seymour Markowitz v. Carolyn CampbellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- In Re: George Jercich, Debtor. James A. Petralia v. George JercichCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by289 opinions
- Eskanos & Adler, P.C. v. Somkiat G. LeetienCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Ormsby v. First American Title Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Barboza v. New Form, Inc. (In Re Barboza)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Khaligh v. Hadaegh (In Re Khaligh)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Lockerby v. SierraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
284 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.