United States v. Conklan
Army Court of Criminal Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
RUSSELL, Judge:
A military judge sitting as a general court-martial found the appellant guilty, pursuant to his pleas, of three specifications of unlawful sexual contact with a trainee and carnal knowledge in violation of Articles 92 and 120, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 892 and 920 (1988) [hereinafter UCMJ]. A panel of officers sentenced the appellant to a dishonorable discharge, confinement for ten years, forfeiture of all pay and allowances and reduction to Private El. The convening authority, pursuant to a pretrial agreement, reduced the confinement to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Menna v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Cooke v. OrserUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
- United States v. KimbleUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1991
- United States v. ChurnovicUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
- United States v. DouseUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- States v. RiveraUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 1996
- Graf v. Hospitality Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts Superior Court · 2015