Legal Opinion

United States v. Conklan

Army Court of Criminal Appeals

Decided February 21, 1995No. ARMY 9301884PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

RUSSELL, Judge:

A military judge sitting as a general court-martial found the appellant guilty, pursuant to his pleas, of three specifications of unlawful sexual contact with a trainee and carnal knowledge in violation of Articles 92 and 120, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 892 and 920 (1988) [hereinafter UCMJ]. A panel of officers sentenced the appellant to a dishonorable discharge, confinement for ten years, forfeiture of all pay and allowances and reduction to Private El. The convening authority, pursuant to a pretrial agreement, reduced the confinement to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Menna v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Cooke v. OrserUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  3. United States v. KimbleUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1991
  4. United States v. ChurnovicUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
  5. United States v. DouseUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. States v. RiveraUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 1996
  2. Graf v. Hospitality Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts Superior Court · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API