Legal Opinion

Sauer v. Universal, et al.

District Court, D. New Hampshire

Decided February 13, 1998No. CV-96-454-MPublished

1Opinion of the Court

Sauer v. Universal, et al. CV-96-454-M 02/13/98 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Catherine Sauer v. Civil No. 96-454-M Universal Instruments and Daniel Schwendeman O R D E R Defendant Universal Instruments moves for partial summary judgment with respect to plaintiff's discrimination claims. Universal contends that Title VII's 300-day limitations period, applicable in this case, and the 180-day limitation period applicable to claims brought under New Hampshire Revised Statute Annotated ("RSA") Chapter 354-A, preclude recovery for any allegedly discriminatory conduct that…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. United Air Lines, Inc. v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Thomasina Mack v. The Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
  5. Carl Kale v. Combined Insurance Company of America, Carl Kale v. Combined Insurance Company of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API