Legal Opinion
Hall v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided November 26, 1943No. 125PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CAYTON, Associate Judge.
Defendant appeals from a conviction on a charge of soliciting prostitution. Code 1940, § 22 — 2701. The testimony was of such a nature that we feel it should be stated euphemistically here.
Officer Bryant testified that he and Officer Nelson were on duty in Franklin Park on the night in question. About 11:30 p. m. they observed defendant, seated on a park bench, in a highly suggestive position, her dress greatly elevated. As they passed in front of her she addressed an enticing question to them; a price of $5 and certain other details were discussed, including the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Caminetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Ercoli v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
- Rogers v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1943
- Hood v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Ford v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- Graves v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
- Curran v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1947
- Garrett v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1975
- Muse v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.