Legal Opinion
Ogden v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided October 16, 1984No. 83-CV-0482PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
PHILIP PRATT, District Judge.
Plaintiffs commenced this action seeking retirement benefits allegedly denied in violation of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. Sec. 1001 et seq., and Michigan Common Law. Plaintiffs have amended their complaint twice. The second amendment was in response to this Court’s decision granting defendant Michigan Bell Telephone Company’s (“Michigan Bell”) motion for partial dismissal pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.Proc., Rule 12(b)(6). Ogden v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co., 571 F.Supp. 520 (E.D.Mich. 1983). Plaintiffs’…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United States v. Kimbell Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Clearfield Trust Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Berlin v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
- Providence Hospital v. National Labor Union Health & Welfare FundMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987
- Ogden v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1987
- Ames v. Ames, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)1988
- Kreml v. Diamond Shamrock Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1988
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.